मुझे लगता है कि इस बात को ज़रूरत से ज़्यादा तूल दिया गया है कि प्रेस खबरों और लोगों के फैसलों को कितना प्रभावित कर सकती है।
I think there's been an overestimation of how much the press can shape coverage and people's decisions.
I think there's been an overestimation of how much the press can shape coverage and people's decisions.
आख़िरकार, सवाल पूछने का हक़ तो पत्रकारों के पास ही होता है।
After all, the reporters are the ones who get to ask the questions.
After all, the reporters are the ones who get to ask the questions.
प्रेस का काम लोगों को सिर्फ़ खबरों का उपभोक्ता न बनाकर, उन्हें एक जागरूक नागरिक के रूप में अपनी भूमिका निभाने के लिए तैयार करना है।
The press is supposed to equip people to act as citizens and not just consumers of programming that happens to be news.
The press is supposed to equip people to act as citizens and not just consumers of programming that happens to be news.
हर बार जब डोनाल्ड ट्रंप कुछ नया खुलासा करने का वादा करते हैं, तो जब असल खुलासे का वक्त आता है, तो ऐसा लगता है कि प्रेस और खासकर जनता के समझने के लिए वादे के मुताबिक कुछ खास हासिल नहीं हुआ।
Each time that Donald Trump promises to come forward with something, when you actually get to the point of disclosure it seems as though there's a lot less that was promised for the press and particularly for the public to understand.
Each time that Donald Trump promises to come forward with something, when you actually get to the point of disclosure it seems as though there's a lot less that was promised for the press and particularly for the public to understand.
आप जानते ही हैं, प्यू (Pew) और अन्य संस्थाओं के चुनावों से जुड़े आंकड़े बताते हैं कि सालों में प्रेस पर लोगों का भरोसा काफी कम हुआ है। शायद प्रेस में लोगों के फैसलों को दिशा देने की उतनी ताकत नहीं बची है।
You know, trust in the press, polls show - from Pew and other places - have gone down significantly over the years. Maybe the press doesn't have that much ability to frame people's decisions.
You know, trust in the press, polls show - from Pew and other places - have gone down significantly over the years. Maybe the press doesn't have that much ability to frame people's decisions.
मुझे लगता है कि हमारे सार्वजनिक नेताओं को ऐसे तरीकों से सुनना बहुत महत्वपूर्ण है जिन्हें वे पूरी तरह से पहले से तय या स्क्रिप्टेड न कर सकें, उन्हें लाइव और बिना किसी स्क्रिप्ट के बोलते हुए देखना और ऐसे सवालों के जवाब देते देखना जिन्हें उन्होंने खुद पहले से प्लान न किया हो। मुझे लगता है कि यह एक ऐसा तरीका है जिससे नागरिक यह तय कर सकते हैं कि वे अपने उन नेताओं के बारे में क्या सोचते हैं जो उनके नाम पर शासन करते हैं, और यह इस बात का आकलन करने का एक तरीका है कि नेतृत्व की गुणवत्ता के बारे में वे क्या महसूस करते हैं।
I think it's very important to be able to hear from our public leaders in ways that they can't entirely orchestrate, seeing them speak live and unscripted and take questions that they themselves haven't arranged ahead of time. I think this is a way in which citizens who are deciding what they think of their leaders who govern in their name, this is one of the ways in which they can evaluate how they feel about the quality of the leadership.
I think it's very important to be able to hear from our public leaders in ways that they can't entirely orchestrate, seeing them speak live and unscripted and take questions that they themselves haven't arranged ahead of time. I think this is a way in which citizens who are deciding what they think of their leaders who govern in their name, this is one of the ways in which they can evaluate how they feel about the quality of the leadership.
ट्रंप के समर्थन में पैसे लेकर आने वाले वक्ता (सरेगेट्स) सीएनएन को उनके समर्थकों को अपने शो से जोड़े रखने में तो मदद करते हैं, लेकिन साथ ही इससे उनके अपने पत्रकारों को उनके कई झूठे दावों के पीछे भागना पड़ता है। यह कोई स्वस्थ समाचार चक्र नहीं है। यह एक खतरनाक और नुकसानदेह सिलसिला है।
The paid Trump surrogates help CNN keep his supporters engaged with their shows, but it also sends their own reporters busy chasing after many of their false claims. That's not a virtuous news cycle. It's an insidious one.
The paid Trump surrogates help CNN keep his supporters engaged with their shows, but it also sends their own reporters busy chasing after many of their false claims. That's not a virtuous news cycle. It's an insidious one.
डोनाल्ड ट्रंप के छाए रहने के कारण, सीएनएन को चुनाव के इस दौर में अपनी अनुमानित कमाई से सौ मिलियन डॉलर ज़्यादा मिलने की उम्मीद है।
CNN stands to make a hundred million dollars more than it's expected lift for the election cycle, due to the phenomenon that is Donald Trump.
CNN stands to make a hundred million dollars more than it's expected lift for the election cycle, due to the phenomenon that is Donald Trump.
किसी समाचार संगठन के लिए काम करने वाले लोगों से, यहाँ तक कि एक खास दृष्टिकोण रखने वालों से भी, यह उम्मीद की जाती है कि वे स्वतंत्र रूप से अपने विवेक का इस्तेमाल करें।
People working for a news organization, even those with a point of view, are supposed to exercise independent judgment.
People working for a news organization, even those with a point of view, are supposed to exercise independent judgment.
मैं किसी चरम सीमा पर विश्वास नहीं करता, पर मुझे लगता है कि डोनाल्ड ट्रम्प खुद के गढ़े हुए एक किरदार हैं। लेकिन मीडिया ने उनके इस तमाशे का पूरा मज़ा लिया है और वे इस लाइमलाइट के बिना नहीं रह सकते। उन्होंने प्रेस पर हमले करके इस सबका चुकाना चाहा, लेकिन इससे तो मीडिया में उनके बारे में और ज़्यादा खबरें ही छपीं।
I'm not at an extreme, but I do think that Donald Trump is a self-created creature. But the media has feasted on his spectacle and he wouldn't live without the attention. He's repaid the favor by attacking the press, but that's generated more reactive coverage.
I'm not at an extreme, but I do think that Donald Trump is a self-created creature. But the media has feasted on his spectacle and he wouldn't live without the attention. He's repaid the favor by attacking the press, but that's generated more reactive coverage.
ट्रम्प के साथ एक दिक्कत यह है कि उनकी छवि को लेकर बहुत ज़्यादा नकारात्मकता है, बहुत से लोग साफ़ कहते हैं कि वे उन्हें वोट नहीं देंगे। इसलिए अगर उन्हें मीडिया में जगह मिली भी, तो शायद उससे उनका कोई खास भला नहीं हुआ।
Trump's - has great negatives, enormous negatives, a lot of people say they simply won't vote for him. So if he's gotten media, maybe it hasn't done him so much good.
Trump's - has great negatives, enormous negatives, a lot of people say they simply won't vote for him. So if he's gotten media, maybe it hasn't done him so much good.
दूर की बजाय पास की चीज़ें ज़्यादा मायने रखती हैं, और अलग की बजाय जानी-पहचानी चीज़ें। प्रेस पर यही आरोप लगता है कि वह एक जैसी त्रासदियों को एक जैसी अहमियत और सम्मान नहीं देती।
Near counts more than far, familiar more than different. Such is the indictment against the press, that it fails to treat similar tragedies with equal dignity.
Near counts more than far, familiar more than different. Such is the indictment against the press, that it fails to treat similar tragedies with equal dignity.