भारत कुल 🥆मिलाकर कोई शांतिवादी देश नहीं था। भारत ने हिंसा के उच्च मूल्यों पर बहुत जोर दिया... लेकिन इसका मतलब यह कभी नहीं था कि कुछ न किया जाए या कायरता दिखाई जाए
India was not a pacifist country at all. India placed great emphasis on the higher value on... on violence. But it was never a substitute for not doing anything, or for cowardice.
India was not a pacifist country at all. India placed great emphasis on the higher value on... on violence. But it was never a substitute for not doing anything, or for cowardice.
मुझे पूरी तरह लगता है कि यह कड़वाहट भारतीय लोगों के बीच इस गलतफहमी से पैदा हुई थी कि चीन ने हम पर आक्रमण किया था, और उन्हें ऐसा लगा था, भारतीय लोगों को
I certainly think the antagonism came out of a mistaken notion amongst the Indian people that the Chinese aggressed on us, and they thought, Indian people
I certainly think the antagonism came out of a mistaken notion amongst the Indian people that the Chinese aggressed on us, and they thought, Indian people
पारंपरिक भारतीय दृष्टिकोण हमारी स्वतंत्रता की रक्षा करने का था; इसलिए यह उस समय की ज़रूरतों और लोगों की भावनाओं के अनुकूल था। हो सकता है कि दुनिया जवाहरलाल नेहरू की अपनी अंतरराष्ट्रीय छवि से भ्रमित हो गई हो, जिसका जमीन पर वास्तव में कोई वजूद नहीं था
The traditional Indian view was to protect our independence; it was therefore quite consistent with the requirements of the time and the feeling of the people. The world may have been misled by Jawaharlal Nehru's own international projection, which in fact had no reality on the ground.
The traditional Indian view was to protect our independence; it was therefore quite consistent with the requirements of the time and the feeling of the people. The world may have been misled by Jawaharlal Nehru's own international projection, which in fact had no reality on the ground.
मुझे लगता है कि भारतीयों के पारंपरिक दृष्टिकोण को लेकर गलतफहमी है। भारत ने वास्तव में गोवा में सेना भेजी थी, भारत ने वास्तव में 1948 में कश्मीर में सेना भेजकर युद्ध लड़ा था, भारत ने बलपूर्वक हैदराबाद को हासिल किया था... मुझे लगता है कि अंतरराष्ट्रीय मंच पर इस संकीर्ण नजरिए ने भारत की छवि को बिगाड़ दिया
I think there is a misunderstanding about Indians' traditional views. India did send army into Goa, India did send an army into and fought a war in Kashmir in 1948, India did get Hyderabad by force... I think the narrow projection on the international... arena distorted India's image.
I think there is a misunderstanding about Indians' traditional views. India did send army into Goa, India did send an army into and fought a war in Kashmir in 1948, India did get Hyderabad by force... I think the narrow projection on the international... arena distorted India's image.
मेरा मुख्य योगदान इन मिथकों को तोड़ना था कि भारत आर्थिक रूप से परमाणु हथियारों का खर्च नहीं उठा सकता। बेशक मैंने ये राजनीतिक तर्क भी दिए, लेकिन मेरा मुख्य योगदान एक विश्वसनीय प्रतिरोधक क्षमता हासिल करने की लागत का अध्ययन करना था, और यह दिखाना कि यह भारत के बजट के दायरे में था, और यह कोई असहनीय बोझ नहीं होगा
My main contribution was to demolish the myths that India couldn't economically afford nuclear weapons. Of course I made these political arguments too, but the main contribution I made was a study of the cost of acquiring a credible deterrent, and show that it was within the budget of India, and it would not be an unbearable burden.
My main contribution was to demolish the myths that India couldn't economically afford nuclear weapons. Of course I made these political arguments too, but the main contribution I made was a study of the cost of acquiring a credible deterrent, and show that it was within the budget of India, and it would not be an unbearable burden.
मुझे लगता है कि भारत के परमाणु हथियार हासिल करने के फैसले में पाकिस्तान कोई कारक नहीं था। क्योंकि पाकिस्तान के पास ऐसी कोई क्षमता होने की कोई बात ही नहीं थी। मुख्य कारक चीन था। और वह अंतरराष्ट्रीय प्रतिष्ठा थी जो चीन को अपने खुद के परमाणु हथियार होने के कारण मिल रही थी
I think Pakistan was not a factor in terms of decision India to obtain nuclear weapon. Because there was no talk of Pakistan having any capability. The main factor was China. And the international prestige that China was getting as a consequence of having its own nuclear weapons.
I think Pakistan was not a factor in terms of decision India to obtain nuclear weapon. Because there was no talk of Pakistan having any capability. The main factor was China. And the international prestige that China was getting as a consequence of having its own nuclear weapons.
हम [1970 के दशक में भारत] निश्चित रूप से लगभग $250,000 की लागत से आठ से दस बम बनाने में सक्षम थे; और यदि आवश्यकता होती, तो उन्हें पहुँचाने के लिए हमारे पास बोइंग 707 विमान थे, इसलिए मुझे लगता है कि उस समय हमारे पास एक शुरुआती क्षमता पहले से ही मौजूद थी
We [India in 70s] certainly were capable of producing eight to ten bombs, at a cost of about $250,000 each; and we had Boeing 707s to deliver them if we needed it, so I think we had a crude capability already at that time.
We [India in 70s] certainly were capable of producing eight to ten bombs, at a cost of about $250,000 each; and we had Boeing 707s to deliver them if we needed it, so I think we had a crude capability already at that time.